Pendampingan Persiapan Olimpiade Matematika dan Biologi pada SMAN 18 Gowa

Authors

  • Nur Aisyah Universitas Pejuang Republik Indonesia
  • Ismi Rayyan Universitas Pejuang Republik Indonesia
  • Mutmainnah Mutmainnah Universitas Pejuang Republik Indonesia
  • Winda Pratiwi Universitas Pejuang Republik Indonesia
  • Riski Seprida Universitas Pejuang Republik Indonesia
  • Asmayani Asmayani Universitas Pejuang Republik Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62007/jouipi.v4i2.1015

Keywords:

Biology, Classroom Action Research, Learning, Mathematics, Student Mentoring

Abstract

The application of Mastery Learning in Olympiad mentoring at SMAN 18 Gowa Regency was carried out using a classroom action research model involving 20 students from grades 11 and 12. The mentoring process followed a cyclical structure consisting of planning, action, observation, and reflection, supported by observation techniques, tests, and documentation. The implementation of the mastery learning model effectively improved students’ mathematics learning outcomes, as shown by a significant increase in mastery levels: 65% before the intervention, 75% after the first cycle, and 90% after the second cycle. In addition, the average learning score rose from 71 in the first cycle to 87 in the second cycle, reflecting substantial progress in understanding and problem-solving abilities. These results indicate that Mastery Learning not only enhances students’ mathematics performance but also strengthens their readiness and confidence to compete in the National OSN competition, demonstrating the model’s positive contribution to academic achievement and Olympiad preparation.

References

Ali, M. (2014). Guru dalam proses belajar mengajar. Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Anwar, F., & Sari, M. (2023). Program pembinaan kompetisi matematika bagi siswa sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pengabdian Pendidikan, 5(2), 101–110.

Asrori, et al. (2009). Penelitian tindakan kelas: Peningkatan kompetensi profesional guru. MultiPress.

Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori-teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Erlangga.

Jihad, A., & Haris, A. (2008). Evaluasi pembelajaran (Cet. 3). Multi Pressindo.

Kunandar. (2012). Langkah mudah penelitian tindakan kelas sebagai pengembangan profesi guru. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Lin, C.-H. (2011). Game-based remedial instruction in mastery learning for upper-primary school students. [Nama jurnal tidak tersedia], 16(2), 273.

Mustami, M. K. (n.d.). Dimensi-dimensi penelitian tindakan kelas. Makassar.

Prasetyo, R., & Lestari, A. (2021). Developing analytical thinking skills for mathematics olympiad preparation. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 12(1), 44–53.

Rahmadani, N., & Yusran, D. (2022). Peran perguruan tinggi dalam penguatan kapasitas sekolah melalui program kemitraan masyarakat. Jurnal Pengabdian Nusantara, 8(3), 227–236.

Sukmana, H., & Hartati, T. (2020). Student competition and motivation in mathematics learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(4), 299–308.

Syah, M. (2009). Psikologi belajar. Rajawali Pers.

Walgito, B. (2004). Bimbingan dan konseling di sekolah. Andi.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2014). Evaluasi program pembelajaran (Cet. 6). Pustaka Pelajar.

Yamin, M. (2013). Desain pembelajaran berbasis tingkat satuan pendidikan. Referensi.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Nur Aisyah, Ismi Rayyan, Mutmainnah Mutmainnah, Winda Pratiwi, Riski Seprida, & Asmayani Asmayani. (2026). Pendampingan Persiapan Olimpiade Matematika dan Biologi pada SMAN 18 Gowa. Jurnal Insan Pengabdian Indonesia, 4(2), 576–583. https://doi.org/10.62007/jouipi.v4i2.1015

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.